TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 1998 15:32:26 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
I agree that the comp.lang.ada.advocacy would be a good approach.  The
problem is that such a group potentially precipitates interminable
inane arguments from anti-Ada gremlins that are absent from the
current advocacy Listserve for  Team-Ada.

Actually, if the ratio of spam to content does not reverse itself soon,
I am seriously considering a return to snail-mail.  Postage stamps and
the U.S. Postal Service is looking more and more attractive when I open
my email inbox and find sixty or more advertisements for pornography,
get-rich quick, and offers to reserach my geneaology.  Sighhhhhhhhhh.

Richard Riehle


[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112

ATOM RSS1 RSS2