TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:38:26 -0500
Reply-To: Stephen Leake <[log in to unmask]>
From: Stephen Leake <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (36 lines)
Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> My understanding of the Team Ada charter is that this really wouldn't be an
> appropriate place for *technical* discussions of using Ada with the JVM.
>
> I posted my question here because I was *advocating* a separate forum. ;-)

On re-reading the Team-Ada FAQ at the ACM SIGAda web site, I agree. So
bring Ada/JVM issues up on comp.lang.ada. It has seen increased
traffic in recent months, but is still fairly low compared to other
groups, and it could use some new technical discussions.

-- Stephe

>
>
> > -----Original Message----- From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83
> > & 95) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Stephen Leake Sent:
> > Tuesday, January 30, 2001 2:09 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject:
> > Re: any interest in a separate forum for targeting the JVM?
> >
> >
> > Terry Westley <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> >
> > > Is there is any interest here in a separate forum for technical discussions
> > > of Ada compilers that target the JVM?
> >
> > No. This is a _very_ low traffic group already. I'd like to see
> > Ada/JVM discussed here; I've played with it some. But not at your
> > level, so I won't be able to help much!
> >
> > --
> > -- Stephe
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2