TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Moran <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Apr 1998 22:33:56 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
In the April 1998 issue of Circuit Cellar Ink, an article
"Software Development for RTOSs" has a section on Real
Time Programming Languages that remarks "Unless you code
for the government or systems that need to be flight
qualified, you probably won't see Ada.  Ada is good for
implementing large systems where many developers are
working in different organizations, but it's sometimes
difficult to use for expressing real-time issues."  Are
those true statements?  If not, perhaps someone could send
a letter to the editor correcting them.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2