TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 08:57:47 -0500
Reply-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (11 lines)
> ..... The catch would be that those compilers would need to support
> ASIS (some don't), and further, you would need to compile your code
> first (ie, have it semantically analyzed) before applying the tool. So
> in that sense, you *do* depend on a "specific compiler"... and the tool
> is a post-processor, ....

A tool that enforces standards _after_ the code is compiled is like having
your code review during testing.

But it's better than nothing......

ATOM RSS1 RSS2