TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X-cc: [log in to unmask]
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Decision in favor of C++ (fwd)
From: Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 08:34:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:38:31 EDT." <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: "Bruce D. Bachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Philip Brashear <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (8 lines) 
Is there a requirement that compilers for these two languages be
validated?  If so, who validates the C compilers?  It's my understanding
that NIST is going out of the compiler validation business.  Surely you
don't require that Ada compilers be validated while allowing unvalidated
C compilers?

Phil Brashear

ATOM RSS1 RSS2