TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:35:23 -0700
Reply-To: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
Dirk Craeynest wrote:
> 
> "Examples of languages generally recognised to be more suitable than C
> [for safety related software] are Ada and Modula-2.  If such languages
> could be available for a proposed system then their use should be
> seriously considered in preference to C."

Since Ada is available for every system that could use C (see the 
SofCheck Ada to C compiler), this is a stronger recommendation that it 
appears.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"We burst our pimples at you."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
16

ATOM RSS1 RSS2