TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 17:19:58 -0700
Reply-To: Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
From: Mark Lundquist <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: Message from Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]> of "Wed, 09 Jun 1999 17:44:41 EDT." <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (33 lines)
From:  Tucker Taft <[log in to unmask]>

> is a big mistake in my view
> for the Ada community to continue to emphasize only long-term savings while
> ignoring short-term issues.  It is pretty clear that time to market is
> the most important criteria in most commercial software development
> activities these days.   I believe that Ada can be used in a prototyping
> mode, and still provide significant benefits, in ease of debugging,
> ease of reading, compile-time error detection, etc.

I strongly agree with this.

All the supposed technical trade-offs of Ada-vs.-whatever:

    long-term vs. short-term
    large-scale vs. small-scale
    "mission-critical" vs. ??? (What?  An alpha-test demo?)
    real-time vs. non-real-time

are myths, and it's not productive in the long run to play to them.

Best regards,


Mark Lundquist
Senior Software Engineer
Rational Software
Development Solutions Business Unit
UNIX Suites Group
Aloha, OR, USA