TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert I. Eachus" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Robert I. Eachus
Date:
Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:48:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
At 12:14 AM 6/9/1999 -0500, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:

> I have spent less then 45 hours porting 17,000 files from Apex to GNAT.

    Some versions of Apex don't use the VADS compiler, but this is probably
a valid data point.  My experience is that switching Ada compilers is more
significant than migrating to Ada 95, and switching Ada compilers is
trivial compared to other languages.

> A good portion of those hours was spent repeating things because I didn't
> have the disk space to do it right the first time.  :-)

    Which is why I mentioned having plenty of disk space available.  The
cost of having enough disk space available for three or more complete
copies/versions of the source library, plus object files and executables is
trival compared to the amount of time saved.  (Three copies?  Original
system/compiler, new system/compiler, and backfits where appropriate:
modified original source with original compiler.  The third may be a
throwaway, but it is useful to the greatest extent possible to check out
modified code in the original environment, before making Ada 95 only or new
compiler only mods.)

                                        Robert I. Eachus

with Standard_Disclaimer;
use  Standard_Disclaimer;
function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2