TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Davenport, Darren" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Davenport, Darren
Date:
Tue, 28 Jul 1998 10:24:36 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
DIA suffers from very poor traffic flow design.  It has a single way
(train) of getting from the terminal to the B and C concourses which of
course means that there is a single point of failure when the trains go
down.  Consequently, alternatives are now being explored which will
mitigate the huge flaw such as opening up other tunnels for pedestrian
use.  Software really has little to do with this and most of the recent
train failures (5 or so since April) have been due to hardware problems.

Darren

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert I. Eachus [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 9:56 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Assistance needed
>
> At 09:20 AM 7/28/98 +1000, Dale Stanbrough wrote:
>
> >I believe the Denver airport baggage snafu was due more to design
> flaws
> >than any particular language issue (i.e. the same problems would have
> >surfaced even if it was programmed in Ada).
>
>     Yes, but from experience, the design problems would have surfaced
> much
> sooner.  This is both the strength and weakness of Ada.  It makes you
> ask
> the hard questions when lots of people don't want to hear them.
>
>                                         Robert I. Eachus
>
> with Standard_Disclaimer;
> use  Standard_Disclaimer;
> function Message (Text: in Clever_Ideas) return Better_Ideas is...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2