TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:38:25 -0800
Reply-To: "John P. Woodruff" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "John P. Woodruff" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <v01540b01b31bba159e8d@[153.37.94.119]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
>I hate to say it, but the time may be approaching when we need to close or
>monitor Team-Ada.  I didn't mind when the volume of junk mail was less than
>1 per week, but getting 7 copies of Silvia_Brown's totally inappropriate
>msg strains my tolerance.  What do others think?   -hh
>
>
>Vittal, Anup (IE10) wrote:
>>This is an Ada Mailing List.



I'm not so sure that it's time for Draconian measures on the basis of
today's experience.  I don't think one inappropriate message (granted, with
several echoes) merits significant changes to policy.  Let's wait a bit to
see if the situation persists.

Besides, if the list were about to become substantially different, surely
the psychic would have mentioned that fact in her message  ;-)


--
John Woodruff                                   N I F   \ ^ /
Lawrence Livermore National Lab               =====---- < o >
925 422 4661                                            / v \

ATOM RSS1 RSS2