TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 17:35:01 -0700
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: AdaWorks <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
I have read and re-read the suggestion from Dr. Eachus regarding
the problem of "with" clauses in sub-units.  I agree with the
need to control coupling and reduce dependencies.  One way to
reduce dependencies is to push the context clause to the level
of source code where it is required.  If the context clause is
specific to the implementation of a subunit, why would it be
coded for the entire package body?  If the goal is to reduce
dependencies, then only the subunit needs to be re-compiled when
the unit on which it depends is re-compiled.

I know I must have misunderstood the counsel in the original message
in which subunit context clauses was referenced.

Richard

Richard Riehle
[log in to unmask]
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 30
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(650) 328-1815
FAX  328-1112
http://www.adaworks.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2