TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ian Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:41:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Ian Goldberg <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
>I agree.  My point was that the scare tactics are counter-productive in
>that they cause many people to not take it seriously.  Especially those
>scare tactics that are designed to sell a solar-powered combination radio
>and flashlight with a windup generator.  Or like a "government agency
>report card" designed to convince voters that their congressman is on top
>of things. :-)

Your message was immediately followed in my mailbox by a piece of SPAM "do you know that your computer is not year 2000 ready? You must have our $39 disk to fix it." Uh-huh.

Scare tactics sell. That's why we'll hear and see a lot of them this year.

The question is, can we (the Ada community) take advantage of this opportunity? Here is a once in a lifetime opportunity to push the advantages of reliable, engineered software. For example, the vast majority of Ada software.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2