 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 1997 09:10:36 -0500 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Organization: |
http://webpages.marshall.edu/~rinscoe |
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Daniel Wengelin wrote:
> Fellow Teamers,
<<snip>>
> Then comes a few unverified rumours that ObjectAda
> (or any of the other compilers that I have not personally used
> recently) barfs on the third level of generic instantiation, or
> something.
>
We've been using VADS Self for Win32 intensively for the past couple of
years, and it has problems that are caused by the use of generics. I
won't go into details here on the list, if you want to know more, e-mail
me.
Even though I'm NOT a C/C++ proponent by any stretch of the imagination,
it doesn't seem to be helpful to our cause that a compiler that costs as
much as VADS, and that is held out to be the best available, has
problems such as we've seen here.
--
Happy trails,
Bob Inscoe
Senior Software Engineer
Strictly Business Computer Systems
Huntington, WV
mailto::[log in to unmask]
mailto::[log in to unmask]
http://webpages.marshall.edu/~rinscoe
|
|
|
