TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Jun 1997 23:43:48 -0700
X-cc:
Ray Toal <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Reply-To:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
TEAMERS:  I'm certainly not  going to discourage Ray from authoring the
paper suggested below.  Anyone else have some feedback for him one way
or the other? --replies directly to Ray (cc above), plz.                -- hh

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 21:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ray Toal <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Mailing List and Possible Ada/OpenGL Paper


Hi Hal...

Also, have you seen anything in Ada Letters recently about Ada and
OpenGL?  I teach OpenGL in my graphics courses at LMU and use both C++
and Ada under Windows NT.  It turns out that the access rules in Ada
95 practically force you to structure your OpenGL apps in a very
elegant way.  Looks like good paper material - if I could be sure it
is pretty novel.  Any thoughts?

Ray



------- End of Forwarded Message

ATOM RSS1 RSS2