TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG
Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 23:51:30 +0100
Reply-To: Jerry van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ FAQ
From: Jerry van Dijk <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> from "Tucker Taft" at Feb 6, 99 11:01:19 am
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version: 1.0
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (16 lines) 
Tucker Taft wrote:

> I took the Ada vs. C++ "trade study" sent out a few days ago,
> and tried to turn it into an FAQ for such a comparison.  Here
> are the results.  Totally unbiased, of course ;-).

Taking the risk of repeating myself, once again I have to conclude
that Ada is only an option for embedded or realtime systems.

Well, maybe that is the truth, and I should pick up Java again.

--
-- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland
-- Team Ada       | [log in to unmask]
-- see http://stad.dsl.nl/~jvandyk

ATOM RSS1 RSS2