TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Mar 1997 03:41:50 -0500
X-To:
[log in to unmask], Herm Fischer <[log in to unmask]>, Carol LeDoux <[log in to unmask]>, Jim Alstad <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Colbert - SIGAda Ada Awareness Manager <[log in to unmask]>, Judy Kerner <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], J M JR Youmans <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], Sy Wong <[log in to unmask]>, Bryce Bardin <[log in to unmask]>, Winsor Brown <[log in to unmask]>, Ray Toal - LMU & LA ACM Treasurer <[log in to unmask]>, Barry Boehm <[log in to unmask]>, David Shochat <[log in to unmask]>, Jock Rader - Hughes <[log in to unmask]>, Liz Manderfield <[log in to unmask]>, Ed Manderfield - LA SIGAda Program Chair <[log in to unmask]>, Lee Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>, Curtis Bradley - SIGAda Treasurer <[log in to unmask]>, Sean McNeil <[log in to unmask]>, George Huling <[log in to unmask]>, Rick Hefner <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
He dropped all other addresses from this reply (below)to my Friday
msg titled "Reason for Mr. Paige's Decision Unclear."  I think it is
important to circulate his very clear double negative in his last
sentence -- opponents of Ada will want to interpret his recent
decision as the opposite (i.e., that he has given up on Ada as of
value to the DoD).
                                        -- hh
-------Forwarded Message
From: "Paige, Emmett Jr., , OSD/C3I +" <[log in to unmask]>
To: Hal Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Reason for Mr. Paige's Decision Unclear
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 23:17:00 -0500

THANKS
I GOT A LOT OF INPUT AND DISCUSSION BUT THE BUCK HAS TO STOP HERE.I DID
WHAT I BELIEVE IS BEST FOR DOD AND HAVE NOT SAID NOR IMPLIED THAT ADA IS
NOT GOOD FOR DOD.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2