TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:46:15 -0600
Reply-To: "David C. Hoos, Sr." <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
Well, now that you mention it, I guess memory didn't serve me completely.
This was done in 1995, so I hope I can be forgiven the lapse -- and, no, I
didn't use the -gnat83 switch.
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Wesley Groleau x4923 <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 1997 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: ADA83 Booch Components Library

>> For what it's worth, I have compiled the entire Ada83 Booch components
>> gnat, and they all compile, except for (if memory serves me correctly)
>> uses of the 'Small attribute in the Floating_Point_Utilities and possibly
>> the Integer_Utilities packages.
>ALL of them?  Did you use the -gnat83 switch?  Seems to me when I tried
>there were at least two of them that had the unconstrained generic formal
>incompatibility, i.e., the one where you have to add (<>) to allow the
>actual to be unconstrained.