TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:46:15 -0600
Reply-To:
"David C. Hoos, Sr." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"David C. Hoos, Sr." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Well, now that you mention it, I guess memory didn't serve me completely.
This was done in 1995, so I hope I can be forgiven the lapse -- and, no, I
didn't use the -gnat83 switch.
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Wesley Groleau x4923 <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 1997 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: ADA83 Booch Components Library


>
>> For what it's worth, I have compiled the entire Ada83 Booch components
with
>> gnat, and they all compile, except for (if memory serves me correctly)
some
>> uses of the 'Small attribute in the Floating_Point_Utilities and possibly
>> the Integer_Utilities packages.
>
>ALL of them?  Did you use the -gnat83 switch?  Seems to me when I tried
>there were at least two of them that had the unconstrained generic formal
>incompatibility, i.e., the one where you have to add (<>) to allow the
>actual to be unconstrained.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2