TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2000 10:49:50 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<"B76ZYLPD4QLS*/R=FBDCVD/R=A1/U=MCCABE JOHN/"@MHS>
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (11 lines)
>>The very low ratio of C++ and JAVA to C still demonstrates that Ada has
>>great possibilities in the embedded market.

>I still get a strong impression that neither of those languages is trusted
>enough to be used in embedded systems where organisations want the product to
>work reliably.

By "neither of these languages" I am referring of course to C++ and Java, not C.

John

ATOM RSS1 RSS2