TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Daniel Wengelin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Daniel Wengelin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Mar 1997 21:10:40 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Fellow Teamers,

early in the long debate on the Mandate and the recent developments, I seem
to recall a comment that there is ample "hard scientific data" that the
productivity using Ada is superior to that of using e.g. C.

Having found nothing at the HBAP I would very much like to be pointed in
the right direction. Not that scientific data will always do the trick, but
at some point in the debate, it's necessary to take to the "hard" tools of
argument ;-)

Daniel W

PS! The one report of substance I know of is that of the Verdix/Rational
merger. DS.

Daniel Wengelin <[log in to unmask]>
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3ia

mQCPAzFZr9MAAAEEAK8Nbxb25/RIZs2Cx2KXrY1piBlhC6qssZ+AW8E7GVYPsBrD
76XWRCoeh/+8bcfLW7B4GvN0OpRhdQPOqeON7KySaV+4mZ8FAgxMqRjRzJu9/4ps
0z9CTagQhPXhLINuBFNuggnj/LuFSegN1e6q58B+V8zn8ClKCBCNjqkHDZzRABEB
AAG0JURhbmllbCBXZW5nZWxpbiA8d2VuZ2VsaW5AYWxnb25ldC5zZT6JAJUDBRAx
Wa/VEI2OqQcNnNEBAZw9A/9bNofi9DtTY1IQjX3qVOkZHXFR4YE2WFsmDe5VeNpc
9acPqSU8tzbsJgVGZ4Y2Fv1czEIlLC1BrOjCweH16mhtt9lSESxdt3svT04MEVxR
Qczk6I1WMOGZhpgds12QULAxfvoKkKvR/3sCuMYfnoEIm5k0JKTs7zTJxoCnlZKJ
KA==
=ZKqg
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2