TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: "Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Marc A. Criley" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:51:22 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To: "Marc A. Criley" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (39 lines)
I don't know that I'd call it a scurrilous diatribe, here's the only mention of Ada that came up when I searched that issue online:

"Throughout the Cold War, the Pentagon spent enormous amounts of national treasure for specialized software that ran everything from aircraft systems to early-warning radars. As ever-cheaper computing power spawned mainstream consumer products, military applications became small, complex, high-cost islands in a sea of shrink-wrapped commercial software. The Pentagon's 1980s mandate that ADA and Jovial programming languages be used for weapon systems led to their becoming orphans as commercial software tools became de facto global standards. Soon, the Defense Dept. found itself reliant on a dwindling supply of ADA and Jovial code-writers. Most programmers opted, instead, for the big bucks earned writing for telecommunication, personal computer and video-game companies."

I remember reading this IT-themed issue a couple weeks ago, and my only real complaint with the contents as a whole was that the writer(s) pretty obviously did not have strong software development background, and so there were errant nits and details (like "ADA") that kept showing up.

Marc A. Criley
www.mckae.com

Available at www.mkae.com:
  XPath In Ada (XIA) v1.00
  DTraq - Data Logging, Monitoring, and Playback



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Amey <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mar 17, 2005 2:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: More rebuttal needed

Team,

I have been alerted to a scurrilous article in Aviation Week (Feb 28th, page 52 if I am correctly informed).  I have been unable to get hold of a copy or access it on line but it is apparently another ill-informed "Ada is dead, COTS is the answer" diatribe.  A letter to the editor is needed I think.   Is anyone already a subscriber and in a position to do this?

regards


Peter


**********************************************************************

This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, disclosure, copying or distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error please contact the sender.  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Praxis High Integrity Systems Ltd (Praxis HIS). 

 Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, no responsibility is accepted by Praxis HIS or any of its associated companies for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt or use thereof.  The IT Department at Praxis HIS can be contacted at [log in to unmask]

**********************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2