TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"Alexander E. Kopilovich" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:46:26 -0500
Reply-To:
David Botton <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Botton <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
All 3 :-) This is a hypothetical question the more possibilities the
better the answers to it.

David Botton


On Dec 15, 2004, at 7:54 PM, Alexander E. Kopilovich wrote:

>>> Why would I want to use Ada for small projects?
>>
>> Why wouldn't you want to use Ada for small projects? Isn't the need
>> for
>> correctness of a project independent of the project's size?
>
> But what is "small" here - in which dimension the project is small?
> Whether it means small number of source code lines or small slot of
> time
> allocated for the project or small budget for it or small justification
> (or even small understanding) of its purpose?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2