TEAM-ADA Archives

Team Ada: Ada Programming Language Advocacy

TEAM-ADA@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95)" <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Pascal Obry <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:28:51 +0300
Reply-To:
"Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from Pascal Obry at Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:36:40 +0100
Organization:
h w c employees, b f
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
>> I disagree. It is quite important issue about Ada: is that language alive
>> enough and can it survive outside of the big corporations? Yes, it is a
>> non-technical question, but
>
>Of course ! As electricity is important for Ada since Ada needs a running
>computer to be really usefull... We just don't have the same definition for
>"in focus" I would say!

"not in focus" and "completely out of focus" aren't the same thing, I think.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2