Johnson Phillip E wrote: > > > Arrogant-Bastard wrote: > > specifically the design-by-committee approach > I have always found this particularly funny when espoused by a C++ advocate. > The look on their face when I show them a copy of a report from the AT&T C++ > language Committee is priceless. They do not want to comment on C++ > enhancements being designed by committee. And C99 draft standard I have is labelled "Committee Draft". A-B will have to stick with K&R C. BTW, using page count as a metric, C99 has a bloat factor almost identical to that of Ada95.