Rush,

> I happen to agree with your statements that Ada productivity is
> equal or better than C++ (after a learning curve) and Ada
> maintenance MUCH easier.  But such statements can easily be
> dismissed as unsubstantiated.

As "C++ is equal or better than Ada" can easily be dismissed as
unsubstantiated :)

I agree with you, but I've seen a lot of time that for chosing
C++ you don't have to give data and facts that it is ok for the
project, but for Ada you must ! The choice is really biased :)

Pascal.

--|------------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                               Team-Ada Member |
--|                                                           |
--| EDF-DER-IPN-SID- T T I                                    |
--|                       Intranet: http://cln46gb            |
--| Bureau N-023            e-mail: [log in to unmask]         |
--| 1 Av Général de Gaulle  voice : +33-1-47.65.50.91         |
--| 92141 Clamart CEDEX     fax   : +33-1-47.65.50.07         |
--| FRANCE                                                    |
--|------------------------------------------------------------
--|
--|           http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--|   "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"