From: Bob Leif To: JF Harrison et al. The best way to build a portable binding is to base it on an XML or XHTML GUI and use the browser as the front-end. -----Original Message----- From: Team Ada: Ada Advocacy Issues (83 & 95) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of JF Harrison Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 11:43 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: About Window bindings think or thin. Will CLAW run in Win4Lin? Win4Lin will run apps like IE5.5, Office, and Photoshop at basically full Windows speed within an X window. Win4Lin does not support Direct X. If you make abso-smutely sure that it will run in Win4Lin, then you can leverage your Windows-centric efforts to the linux world. It would be nice if Win4Lin would run in BSD, too, but that isnt supported. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Moran" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 11:02 AM Subject: Re: About Window bindings think or thin. > > Are they any > > other freely available bindings that would be worth looking > > into but that > > have escaped my eyes? > The Introductory version of CLAW is (source code) downloadable from > www.rrsoftware.com for $0. Last time I checked, it was the largest > "thick" binding to Windows around, and there is also an upgrade path > (the $/=0 version) if you find you need some additional function and > don't have the time to write it yourself. There's also a GUI Builder, > Intro version for $0, full version from RRSoftware.com I believe the > Intro versions of both CLAW and the GUI builder are free for > non-commercial use, or for commercial evaluation. > As one of the developers of CLAW, I think highly of it. ;) >