> The problem is not that "lack of quality doesn't cost ...much". It > actually costs a hell of a lot. Since I only work part time, 2 hours per > week is roughly 10 percent of my time. What I meant was sucky software doesn't cost the vendor much because the customer expects it and puts up with it. > software quality - and especially when the general public comes to > understand that the "C-world" excuse that "software just can't be done > right" is just plain false - I think we are going to see a war against lack > of quality that makes Ralph Nader look like a Girl Scout out on a Sunday > picnic. :) You say when, I say IF. -- Wes Groleau http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau