On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Michael Feldman wrote: "Stephane et al, See http://cui.unige.ch/db-research/Enseignement/analyseinfo/Ada95/BNFindex.html for a nice text and graphic rendering of Ada 95 BNF. They don't have an Ada 83 one there, but syntax-wise there are few differences. General access types, protected types, and tagged types are the ones that come to mind. The syntactic leap is _much_ smaller than from C to C++, for example." However Ada 83 and Ada 95 are not the same. To read the email lists; webpages; and newsgroup one would strain by and large to see Ada 83 but it is still being used. Mike Feldman "Hello everyone, Could I please be pointer to a website and/or a good PDF file that explains in details the Ada 83 and 95 Grammar in B.N.F. format? I prefere Ada 95, but if there is only Ada 83 B.N.F. Existing out there, so be it. Thank you everyone Stephane Richard Software Developer -- Stephane Richard Software Developer [log in to unmask] Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net" If you prefer and are happily using Ada 95 I do not want to deter you from that. However I will still publicise an Ada 83 B.N.F. file on the Internet: http://www.32sixteen.com/ada83.y and send comments (if any) to [log in to unmask] Glad you already got the Ada 95 material you wanted. Colin Paul Gloster