On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:55:37 +0200, Elizabeth J. Pyatt <[log in to unmask]>  

> [Nielsen's] eyetracking & usability studies generally find that online  
> readers scan rather than read (partly because monitor legibility isn't  
> as good as print legibility)

I remember a talk at CHI a few years ago [maybe Vienna] that showed that  
if links weren't underlined that people started reading again rather than  
scanning. Unfortunately I can't now find the reference.

If anyone can point to it, I'd be much obliged.

Steven Pemberton

           Tip of the Day: Postings must be in plain text
     CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/web POSTINGS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
              MODERATORS: mailto:[log in to unmask]
       SUBSCRIPTION CHANGES & FAQ:  www.sigchi.org/web/faq.html