I like the way Eudora handles this. After your search, In the search results window is a checkbox for "Search results." You simply check the box and enter a new term in the original search field. Perhaps "Search these results" would be more clear. 1. One active box, to avoid having to label, explain, error, etc. 2. If you want your first term to persist you could simply display it or display it in a grayed-out inactive field and the new field could pop into view as the checkbox is checked, next to it on a new line. 3. In Eudora you can't. You have to redo the initial search. It's easy and fast though. If I were to design one today I would probably use a Back button (left-pointing arrow) since those are well understood in browsers now. It could re-do the search for the user. If your search engine is slow, perhaps you could cache the results instead of re-searching. I find I generally search, search within, and if I get too few results, I want the initial results again, to re-do a search within using a new term. So keeping the search-within results handy is not useful, but keeping the original results is. Note that Google accomplishes this search-within trick by simply adding term 2 to term 1 in the search box. If that would work for your search engine, you could teach users to do this by showing them the query string in the first box as it is altered to use the second term. They could widen their search by deleting any operator and the second (or third, etc.) term. Susan At 3:16 PM +0530 12/18/12, Devika Ganapathy wrote: >Also should have added - The high level search results are a list of >technical terms listed in an accumulator. A 'search within results' function >is required since this list could be very lengthy. > > > >From: Devika Ganapathy [mailto:[log in to unmask]] >Sent: Tuesday, 18 December, 2012 11:26 AM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: best practices for search within results > > > >Hi everybody, > >I'm looking for best practices / examples on 'search within results' for a >web application. > >The specific questions I am looking at are: >1) Is it better to display two separate search boxes or use one box to >search and then search within results? >2) If two boxes are used, what ways can they be visually differentiated? >3) Once a search within results is done, how does one get back to the >original search results? > > > >Thanks in advance! > >Best Regards > >Devika Ganapathy > > > >anagramresearch > >Design Research + Usability Consulting and Training > > > >Skype: devika-ganapathy | Phone: +91-9886702014 > >www.anagramresearch.com > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask] > with any comments, questions or problems > CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/resources/web/faq.html > MODERATOR: mailto:[log in to unmask] > -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- Tip of the Day: Email mailto:[log in to unmask] with any comments, questions or problems CHI-WEB: www.sigchi.org/resources/web/faq.html MODERATOR: mailto:[log in to unmask] --------------------------------------------------------------