W. Wesley Groleau wrote: > What irritated me even more than compiler bugs was > that people would refuse to use the optimizer on any file. > > I always figured it to turn off the optimizer for one out of a hundred > files was a lot easier than some of the code contortions people would > write for the sake of "hand-optimizing". I find this difficult to understand. If you understand in detail all the bugs in your compilation system and you have tools to inspect your source code so that you can identify any files that might suffer from the bugs, then perhaps I /would/ agree. My experience is different. Compiler bugs tend to be pathelogical, otherwise they would have been found before and fixed (I'm an optimist). Often they cause the code to behave oddly under obscure situations which, sadly, don't always get tested. If an optimiser significantly increases the incidence of latent bugs, that is bad news. Our systems here are built from many hundreds of files. Productivity requirements lead us to adopt an approach to the building of these systems which is sytematic and largely mechanised. Special cases, such as supressing the optimiser, are not welcome, and hence my comment earlier about the need for tool support. We don't use the optimiser. Personally, I would like it to be used so that we had a reasonable chance of hammering out the bugs in it, but we don't have the resources. Performance /is/ a worry. Fortunately, hardware continues to improve fast enough for us to be able to deliver the performance improvements we need. Additionally, our understanding of the right way to do things continues to improve, and so we sometimes find that a revision to add functionality also increases performance. There may well come a time when we need to use the optimiser, but I suspect that it will only be for isolated units, and the code generated will be scrutinised most carefully. Perhaps I should add that the compiler of which I am speaking is rather long in the tooth now, and I am sure that, were we not constrained by certain policies, we should have different experiences with a modern compiler. -- --Michael Pickett--