>>> Michael Feldman <[log in to unmask]> 11/06/97 04:48pm >>> [said John, replying to Hal] > > Would it really be a bad thing if people who are not specifically > interested in Ada and would not attend an Ada specific panel > were attracted to your panel by it's new name? Get them there with > talk of the SPR's and then convince them that Ada will win if the > reviews are fair. > Yes, this sort of "subversive tactic" has some merit. BUt this misses Hal's main point - now that Ada is no longer _required_ by DoD, but is now optional, have the Powers that Be at STC decided that Ada no longer merits the slightest attention? Mike Feldman ============== Mike, Alas! So it would seem. (At least there appears to be some reluctance to use the "A" word 8~)