On 6/21/99 11:46 AM, W. Wesley Groleau x4923 wrote:

>Nor is it true (as they try to mislead us to think) that the Java
>_language_ is somehow needed to get the benefits of J-Code.  Not only are
>there at least two Ada to J-Code compilers, but there are ways to generate
>J-Code from Cobol, C++, Eiffel, Smalltalk, BASIC, and a host of others.  I
>forget the URL and NT problems prevent me calling up Netscape right now,
>but do a Web search for the page titles "Languages for the Java Virtual
>Machine."

"Languages for the Java VM"
<http://grunge.cs.tu-berlin.de/~tolk/vmlanguages.html>

"The following is a list of programming languages for the Java
 virtual machine aside of Java itself. Currently (Dec 1997),
 it comprises about 60 different systems."

                                    Bob Collins