"W. Wesley Groleau x4923" wrote: > > > I have not been able to get the tool to work. I could understand the lack > > of need for support if the tool was trivial to use and had no bugs. But > > unless I am making some really simple mistake (always possible), it is not > > trivial to use correctly. > > The c2ada Web page at Intermetrics listed Python and some other things as > prerequisites. Python downloaded and built as per instructions, and > seemed to work. But all the other prerequisites failed to even build when > I followed their instructions. Had to find one of them by Web search > because the hyperlink was stale. > > But, you get what you pay for. :-) Years ago I spent a long time trying to get c2ada even to build. It seemed to me it was badly broken, the C code even had syntax errors. I gave up and did what I needed to do by hand. To this day, I am mystified as to how some people apparently manage to use c2ada.